insead      
The Team Newsroom Contact Us
Knowledge  
Search
GO
 
Home Podcast Portal iTunes U
Newsletter
RSS Login Text Guided Tour
 

Anatomy of a crisis

Changes in financial regulation in the past decade, coupled with the loose monetary policy of former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, are partly to be blamed for the financial crisis that has brought the world into the brink of recession, according to INSEAD Affiliate Professor of Accounting and Dean of the MBA programme, Jake Cohen.

“The issue to some extent is a perfect storm of regulatory policy,” says Cohen.Jake Cohen


Following the Great Depression of the 1930s, the US Congress passed the Glass-Steagall Act to separate investment and commercial banking industries. As a result some banks split up, with JPMorgan becoming a commercial bank and Morgan Stanley an investment bank.


However, the act was repealed in 1999 as banks lobbied Congress to allow them to be both commercial and investment banks again.


As such, Cohen says banks were able to give mortgages, securitise these mortgages and sell them as collateralised debt obligations (CDOs) to institutional investors. This allowed the banks to lend more because the sale of CDOs gave them access to a new source of funding apart from customer deposits.


Low interest rates in the 1990s along with rising housing prices spawned reckless lending practices that gave birth to subprime lending or lending to people who did not qualify for loans. The subprime borrowers bet that housing prices would continue to rise and allow them to refinance their mortgages at lower interest rates.


They were wrong.


US housing prices peaked in 2005 and have since fallen by nearly 30 per cent from their highs, according to Standard & Poor’s Case-Shiller home price indices.


Subprime borrowers were unable to refinance their loans as the value of their homes fell below the level of their outstanding mortgages, forcing many to default on their mortgage payments and triggering a collapse in the value of CDOs held by banks and institutional investors.

Definition of foreclosure on dictionary pageAs banks faced mounting mortgage defaults, new accounting rules that took effect in 2007 required banks to mark-to-market their assets, including securities such as the CDOs. Valuations of these assets collapsed as investors stayed away from such risky assets, forcing banks to write-off the value of these assets and subsequently weakening their balance sheets.


Banks needed to raise fresh capital to replenish their balance sheets and improve financial ratios but cautious investors were unwilling to lend capital, creating a credit crunch that is now dragging the global economy into recession.


“The crisis may well be subsequently blamed on mark-to-market accounting. It is making things worse because it came into existence at a time when subprime mortgages were already causing problems,” says Cohen.


As the crisis deepens, investors are waiting for the next bank to fail, not only in the US but also in Europe. 


In recent months, Lehman Brothers went bust, the Fed had to bail out insurance giant AIG and mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had to be nationalised. More American banks are in danger of failing, with Merrill Lynch bought over by Bank of America and Wells Fargo taking over Wachovia.


Troubled European banks have also emerged, including Fortis and HBOS. So far no Asian bank has failed as a result of global financial crisis but the outlook remains shaky because a recession in the US and Europe would dampen demand for Asia’s exports, which contribute significantly to the domestic economies in the region.


It remains to be seen whether the $700 billion bailout plan in the US and concerted efforts by governments around to world to ease the credit crunch and stimulate their economies will work. But one thing is clear: what began as a financial crisis is turning into an economic downturn that could last through next year.

JB 11/08



Share knowledge with:


del Del.icio.us     Digg    reddit    Facebook    StumbleUpon


Please comment:
 
Your email address:
 
Please enter your comments including your name and location:
 
Word verification:
Please, type the code you see in the picture above.

 

Your Comments
I agree with the perceptions of Prof. Cohen. This I predicted in 2005, as the fundamentals of many products are in fact very bad, in most of the corporate world and worse still the governments all over talked too much about consumer economics.

Imbalanced consumption will definitely fall flat, as the end is always close by. It is just like nuclear radioactive waste to be cased in a perfectly leak-proof casket/case/container sustainable for 1000 years, then only the toxic effects of the radioactive waste will deteriorate.

If you open it earlier, it will just exterminate you once and for all.

Most of the assets were really becoming toxic assets and if those assets are not kept in a fully-controlled situation, naturally, the situation will cross break-even point and once it crosses that line, disaster is just imminent.

Similarly, there has been greed everywhere in the world to become a great economic power.

Every run should have a calculated risk structure, like a driver of a vehicle should always be ready to apply the brake, if some unforeseen problem emerges. If he fails to apply the brake, an accident takes place.

Many a time accidents tend to be fatal, unless accident care is provided, running highway ambulances and mobile medical care vans with capable surgeons and other specialists to take care of the patient. Without any of the needed protection shields, one is bound to die sooner than expected.

Similarly subprime crises were indeed snowballing as Cohen said, when the banks started dressing up their balance sheets the moment investors shied away. Investors are indeed more clever and intelligent than the bankers. Now we see that subprime crises in the USA and it has spread to Europe and imports will be terribly affected in the US and Europe, and the Asians - or, for that matter, any county which lives on export earnings will definitely fall.

My estumate for recovery (is that it) may take at least 2 to 3 years, since the balance of economies is already in a shambles (and) highly toxic, contributed by politicians who are not political economists of any standing!

It is not to coat pessimism but the truth is politicians still rule market sentiment, in the name of democracy. That is indeed a big drag on countries. That does not mean democracy is bad but controls should be in place like accelerators and brakes in a car or any vehicle. After all, money is also driving profits and losses on revenue and expenditure balancing. So Mr. Cohen is correct. Thanks. G Balakrishnan/India
posted on : 23-Nov-2008

Your Comments

 


Share this article Find us in  
INSEAD on Facebook INSEAD on Linkedin INSEAD on Twitter Bookmark this page INSEAD on Youtube INSEAD on iTunes  

 

Video Vault More Video

Related Articles

bulletUS economy may plunge into depression if banking sector bail-out fails

bulletWe should heed the lessons of the collapse of the ‘golden age’: a personal view

bulletLiving with uncertainty

bulletSteering a new course in unchartered waters


bulletCan China help power the global economy out of a crisis?

bulletBanks in Asia may weather global financial crisis

 


Related Programmes




Hot Topics

Blue Ocean Strategy

Economics / Politics

Entrepreneurship & Family Enterprise

Finance

Innovation

INSEAD Leadership Summit

Leadership

Marketing

Networking & Organisations

Strategy

Social Innovation

Deciphering the Crisis

Corporate Governance

Op-Eds

Gender Diversity

Subscribe now for free access!
Your Email : GO