insead      
The Team Newsroom Contact Us
Knowledge  
Search
GO
 
Home Podcast Portal
Newsletter
RSS Login Text Guided Tour
 

Cross-cultural negotiations: avoiding the pitfalls

When entering into negotiations, we should always take into account cultural factors such as the educational or religious background of the person sitting across the table, but, says INSEAD professor Horacio Falcao, many people both underestimate and overestimate the cross-cultural aspects.

Horacio Falcao

That’s something of a paradox, says Falcao, Affiliate Professor of Decision Sciences. In terms of underestimating cross-cultural factors, “People come to me normally and ask ‘how do I negotiate with the Chinese? And I would say which Chinese exactly do they want to talk to? Do you want to talk to the Chinese from Beijing or in Shanghai? The one who came from the countryside and moved to the city, or the one who was born and raised in the city?”

“There are so many Chinese … that it becomes really hard because they all have what? Different cultures beyond just being Chinese and that’s the underestimation (part).”

“People tend to only look at national culture when they go into international negotiations … but there is also educational culture, race culture, gender culture, a religious culture. All of these also impact the way people behave and they are all ‘cross cultural,’ which means that we’re underestimating the role of culture because we are only looking at the national one; but as negotiators, we need to try to understand all the others.”

This is because these cultural factors will help “us understand how the other person thinks and communicates, and therefore (we’ll) be able to negotiate and persuade that person better,” Falcao says.

On the other hand, if the person across the table comes from a similar background, we can also fall into the trap of making incorrect assumptions. “Why? Because with that second person, we might feel we are so alike, that we make so many assumptions that we should know and understand (each) other that we are going to run of the risk of over-estimating that proximity.”

 

When negotiating with “someone I see is so different from me, I am going to be so extra careful through the negotiations … that I would actually run less of that risk.”

Falcao says we should regard every negotiation as a ‘cross-cultural exercise,’ adding that communication – the process in which people deal with each other – is a very important dimension in which rituals have a major impact.

“In Japan, you don’t say no directly,” he says, “you have to find a more indirect way to let the other person know and understand that you don’t want to do something.”

Training or coaching can help negotiators avoid some of the pitfalls. Falcao says he “would much rather have someone from the country (of the other side in the negotiations) help me understand what normally goes on, especially someone who has bi-national experience – someone who has lived in the country that you’re going to …  so they can do the translation as accurately as possible.”

  

In terms of tactics, he advises a strategy of exploration, preparation and adjustment. “Istart with the assumption maybe, of Illustration of pairs of people with globe in backgroundat the very ‘get-go’, of zero: I don’t know. And why does that help me? That helps me to approach you from a learning prospective; I’ll start to try to learn as fast as I can about you to know if you’re friend or foe.”

That said, it can be wrong to assume the person across the table has to be either friend or foe. “The individual in front of you might be neither, or might be both, depending on how you approach them. If I already approach them as foe, they will reciprocate, if I approach them as friend, they might reciprocate as well.”

“So you need to really understand that one person there,” he says. You have to figure out how much you need to adjust or adapt to the person across the negotiating table. “In terms of negotiations, there are only two cultures: the competitive culture and a collaborative culture, friend or foe in a way.”

“We try to build a system that works for both of us,” he adds. “That might take time, but if you are talking about a long-term relationship, or a big value-creation exercise, or something that just matters a lot, then that’s the right way to do it. It might be a little harder, it might take a little bit more time, but you run much less risks and you are much more certain to be successful.”




Share knowledge with:


del Del.icio.us     Digg    reddit    Facebook    StumbleUpon


Please comment:
 
Your email address:
 
Please enter your comments including your name and location:
 
Word verification:
Please, type the code you see in the picture above.

 

Your Comments
Whilst I agree with the thrust of the argument laid out here, one point which is often over looked is that there are situations where compromise is just not possible, an extreme example would be where you have been defrauded by someone or where the counter party is acting in breach of an agreement. These situations do occur in both developed markets and developing markets and you may be forced to operate with a different set of negotiating tools than establishing a dialogue. Functionally the best negotiators I have seen in action can role-play to fit the situations, for example I have seen people deliberately cross cultural boundaries to show that they are no longer in a consensual "mode". Would people argue this is the wrong way to approach things?

(Anon)
posted on : 05-Jan-2010
Nice and short article on a very important topic. Most of the time, cultural differences are underestimated and the strategy of starting from a "willing to learn" point seems appealing and might lead to a better understanding of the negotiation partners.

What about the cases of overestimating the importance of cultural differences? Couldn't find them in the article.

Uwe Kollenkirchen, Project Leader Pharmaceutical Industry, Berlin Germany
posted on : 05-Jan-2010
Thank you for having taken the time to write the article. However, it is far too basic and commonsense. So it does not provide added value for someone in business or academics. From a school like INSEAD I would expect more substance, differentiation, theoretical thought and academic evidence.

Best regards
Dr. Joachim Poesch
posted on : 05-Jan-2010
Prof. Falcao’s illustrates in simple terms the greatest challenge of any negotiation, which is to establish a collaborative decision-making process that enables the settlement of an agreement between two or multiple parties that is “advantageous to all”.

“Advantageous to all”, there specifically relies the greatest challenge, as human perception differs even within the same cultural-references and what is perceived as “beneficial” to one person might be perceived as “detrimental” to another.

Effectively, social psychology studies demonstrate that personal factors and social stereotypes such as perceived subordination or insubordination or even cultural politeness, will considerably influence the perceived outcomes of any agreement. This pattern falls into the principles of equity (J.S. Adams 1965 Inequity in social exchange) the relational satisfaction between individuals and groups on their respective perception of the distribution of resources. A general formula demonstrates this equilibrium:

Individual’s outcomes Partner’s outcomes
_____________________ = _______________________

Individual’s inputs Partner’s inputs

Henceforth, Prof. Falcao’s clearly indentifies that negotiation involves more than simply measurable elements such as time, money and financial forecasts, but also candid cultural leadership abilities, emotional intelligence, strong communications skills, self-confidence, mind openness and above all, humanity: a willingness to genuinely understand the other party’s perspective and accept fundamental divergence of opinions while searching for fundamental similitude.

Jean-Francois Landre, EMBA, MBA
President and CEO
Helion Consulting (Canada)
Harvard Law School Alumni (PON)
posted on : 05-Jan-2010
The value of this article is in the last paragraph on building a system/long term/big value creation. Other articles focus more on the 'givens' in cultures as 'do's' and 'dont's.'

Overassumption/underassumption in the cross cultural process US-EU is one of the leads on which I build the vision for my new venture.
www.2MEDICAL-europe.com. Instead of requiring small US-based medical device inventors to cross 27+ cultures in Europe themselves, my mission is to create value by building a 3rd process to create business value.
Although (West) European and American cultures might look closely related, it is my experience that building in time to "synchronise" the relation is important to road map the bridges to cross before rushing (because we are so alike...) into negotiation on the obvious contractual points without understanding the individuals' culturally driven needs in the partnership.

Maarten Nibbelke (AMP '06)
CEO/founder 2MEDICAL-europe
posted on : 05-Jan-2010
Cultural differences are particularly important because they can make or break entire organisations. Most global projects fail due to lack of cultural understanding. Culture influences human behaviors, attitudes, values, and beliefs. In the book Organizational Behavior, SP Robbins writes: "Attitude is an emotional tendency to react consistently to an object. Attitude leads to behavior. Belief is an assumed truth, while value is a broad tendency to prefer a certain state of affairs over others."

Organizational cultures offer another layer of complexity on top of international, national, and regional cultures. A manager's goal is to acquire an understanding of these differences, and over time and with experience, make them co-exist in harmony. There is no silver bullet for becoming culturally adept, but here are some tips when the culture is unknown:

1) Assume differences until proven
2) Emphasize facts than interpretations
3) Treat interpretations as working hypothesis
4) Practice empathy

-Puneet M Sangal
Director of Technology
PharmaSecure Inc.
posted on : 04-Jan-2010
Some important points made in this article.

It is also important to note that those we are negotiating or communicating with will also be adjusting to our backgrounds and maybe making allowances. So for example a straight "no" in Japan coming from a westerner may not be such a problem. I accept that it is usually appreciated if we take responsibility for adapting but it is a two-way dynamic.

Rick Payne
Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW)
posted on : 08-Oct-2009
Useful and practical. You definetely need to know more than the nationality of your counterpart for running successful negotiations. I like the idea of the learning perspective, this surely helps going around the usual trap of negotiations, ie forgetting to learn how the other side is looking at the issue. Negotiators often stand firm on their own beliefs without considering the other's standpoint; usually this does not end well.

I had the chance of attending one of Horacio's lectures on negotiations and I recommend it. I use his tips on a daily basis.

Michael K, Alstom (AMS 16)
posted on : 08-Oct-2009
Interesting. But I am missing the role of the underlying cultural values. Professor Geert Hofstede has done some thorough research on this subject. The five dimensions of Hofstede are really helpful in understanding different cultures. Not only during negotiations but also in working together in multinational organisations and teams. Or in global advertising. McDonalds is an example of an organisation which has adapted its advertising to the local culture with great results.
Proper training based on cultural values in this area helps organisations to become more effective.

Sander Janssens
Lecturer Intercultural communication
Windesheim University of Applied Sciences
Zwolle, Netherlands
posted on : 07-Oct-2009
Interesting and useful article for its realistic vital aspect in all times, in tough times like those today in particular.

I enjoyed reading the article.

Thank you!

Norma Fares
Lebanon
posted on : 13-Jun-2009
Prof Falcao is right, focusing only on the country is a mistake. Each people has its own history, so its own culture, which is not only determined by the national culture he is living in. So a deal focusing on the individual seems better. But what about the organisation the individual represents? Each organisation has its culture too, which is not the country's culture, nor the dealer's one ... but is also in the heart of the negotiations.

Florimon Delalande
posted on : 13-Apr-2009
Good article. I find it useful from our software sales perspective, where the purchase decision makers could be across the boundary.

Regards,
Sameer
posted on : 06-Apr-2009
I liked your norms of CCN and think it's very important for any negotiator.

Masters in DCAR
Nova Southeastern University

Mashael Ghouth
posted on : 29-Jan-2009
An interesting piece by Prof Horacio. One thing that struck a cord was that most people believe that there is only one culture, i.e. national culture, but large countries such as China and India have several sub-cultures which have to be taken into consideration. As in China, India too has a distinct East-West-North-South cultural divide. And as Horacio says there is the rural and urban culture prevalent too.

Vijay Pereira
Senior Lecturer, HRMM
Business School, University of Portsmouth. UK
posted on : 21-Jan-2009
No doubt entering into negotiations with a person from another nationality call for a lot of preparation, but the idea that a simple coffee-table conversation with your peer whom you've known for sometime is also an intercultural conversation is rather perturbing. Clearly it's the individual who is the most important entity before entering into a negotiation, irrespective of him being from the USA or Japan; the homework before a negotiation should be centered around the individual.

Abhishek Sharma
IMT Ghaziabad
Class of '10
posted on : 31-Dec-2008
I would strongly agree that understanding the cultural dynamics is a critical business assessment step most MNCs minimize or overlook when assessing their business in the context of the Asian markets. In my business assessment model I suggest a business assesses the cultural dynamics in three key areas- organizational, professional and geographical.

Peter Gray
EMBA, Strategic International Marketing
MA, International Relations in Trade and Economy
posted on : 11-Jul-2008
Cross-cultural negotiation is a fascinating and challenging field; there is a lack of empirical research in this area especially in this era of globalization. I teach negotiation as a set of skills, one of which is cross-cultural understanding as an important pre requisite to successful cross-cultural negotiation. As an academic, I am very interested in establishing collaboration with other academics as well as practitioners to conduct joint research.
posted on : 02-Jun-2008
Very interesting. Fits in with what I do for a living. I work with families and individuals being expat or inpat to the US and help them understand the cultures they will be encountering to help them avoid the pitfalls and issues they may be faced with.

More companies need to recognize the critical nature of this important area of business or they may perpetuate the failures of the past.

(no name given)
posted on : 29-Apr-2008
Very interesting with clear messages; I will add that it is always important to identify and use the common ground that creates links between both negotiators.
posted on : 24-Apr-2008

Your Comments

 


Email this article Print PDF


Video Vault More Video

Related Articles

Closing the deal in negotiations: Avoid rushing in

bullet point
Networking is vital for successful managers

bullet pointFrank Brown on mentoring



Related Programmes
Negotiation Dynamics

Managing Partnerships and Strategic Alliances

Strategic Issues in Mergers and Acquisitions

  



Hot Topics

Blue Ocean Strategy

Economics / Politics

Entrepreneurship & Family Enterprise

Finance

Innovation

INSEAD Leadership Summit

Leadership

Marketing

Networking & Organisations

Strategy

Social Innovation

Deciphering the Crisis

Subscribe now for free access!
Your Email : GO