insead      
The Team Newsroom Contact Us
Knowledge  
Search
GO
 
Home Podcast Portal iTunes U
Newsletter
RSS Login Text Guided Tour
 

It's time to change our questions: a personal view

---- by Hal Gregersen, INSEAD Affiliate Professor of Leadership ----

Transformational leaders ask innovative questions — lots of them.  In anticipation of President Obama’s inauguration speech, I wondered if he would do the same, but found that his questions fell a bit short compared to innovative leaders in other times and places.


For example, research on the entrepreneurial founders at 25 of the most innovative companies in the world — places like Apple, eBay, and Amazon — reveals that they rely heavily on countless, catalytic questions to create revolutionary new ways of doing business.  Such questions help break the status quo and prompt powerful, personal action. 

Many great US presidents have done the same.  Look at Lincoln.  In Lincoln’s First Inaugural, almost one of every five statements was a question — a rate matched by no other presidential inaugural in US history.  These were not garden-variety queries, but pointed and probing ones delivered in a moment of crisis, with a number of states already seceded and the threat of civil war looming. His questions forced hard thinking about where his nation was headed and why, versus where it could be headed and what it would take to get there. Here’s a sampling:

  • “Before entering upon so grave a matter as the destruction of our national fabric, with all its benefits, its memories, and its hopes, would it not be wise to ascertain precisely why we do it?”
  • “Will you hazard so desperate a step, while there is any possibility that any portion of the ills you fly from have no real existence?”
  • “Will you, while the certain ills you fly to are greater than all the real ones you fly from, will you risk the commission of so fearful a mistake?”
  • “Why should there not be a patient confidence in the ultimate justice of the people?  Is there any better or equal hope in the world?  
  • “Can aliens make treaties easier than friends make laws?”

Of course, Lincoln just didn't ask questions. He also offered some preliminary answers. With respect to the last question noted, he asserts: We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection.” 

Clearly, today’s nation and the world is also entitled to 'answers' from its leaders, especially during such uncertain times as we now face.  And clearly, President Obama delivered many excellent preliminary answers during his inauguration, addressing issues ranging from international economic woes to greater world peace to global warming and beyond. 

He also pleaded that “the time has come to put away childish things … (to) pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off, and begin again the work of remaking America (and the world for that matter). For everywhere we look there is work to be done.” 

He argued passionately for a rekindling of core values such as faith, determination, kindness, selflessness, courage, honesty, hard work, fair play, tolerance, curiosity, loyalty, and responsibility to guide and lift us through the challenges ahead. But perhaps his nation and the world might have been even better served by also presenting provocative questions to trigger powerful personal reflection and perhaps touching more deeply the “better angels of our nature” necessary to sustain the “hope” and “bonds of affection” as we move forward (and as Lincoln believed was key to a country’s survival). 

So as I reflected on Lincoln’s powerful questions before President Obama’s inauguration, I could not help but wonder:  “What world-changing questions might Obama propose during the inauguration?  What great questions will he ask to help his nation and perhaps the world prepare for the next four years? Or even the next forty years?” 


So how did President Obama do?  He delivered one question out of 111 statements, declaring: “The question we ask today is not whether our government is too big or too small, but whether it works.”  Given the current crises facing his nation as well as the world, asking us all to consider what government can and must do differently is good. But perhaps he could have probed even more directly and personally, as President Kennedy did in 1961 when he declared with crystal clarity: “Ask not what our country can do for us, but what can we do for our country” and then he questioned the “fellow citizens of the world” to “ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man (and woman).  And finally he reflected “whether you are citizens of America or citizens of the world, ask of us (Americans) the same high standards of strength and sacrifice which we ask of you.” 

These are the questions that started to change the world in 1961. And if taken seriously, such questions may well continue to change the world in 2009. For too long, now, it seems too many of us, in too many different areas of life, in too many parts of the world have been predominantly asking “how can we get something for nothing”? 

Indeed, if it really is a time for change, and I believe that it is, then it may just be time to start changing our questions.  So as the leader of one of the most powerful nations on the earth, President Obama, we look forward to hearing and reflecting on your future questions to help us transform hoped for changes into concrete reality during the next four years.



Hal Gregersen is the co-author (with Jeff Dyer at BYU/Wharton and Clayton Christensen at Harvard) of a forthcoming Harvard Business Review article on the world’s most innovative business leaders and co-author of 'It Starts With One: Changing Individuals Changes Organisations' (Wharton, 2008). 



This article was first published on January 21, 2009.

HG 01/09



Share knowledge with:


del Del.icio.us     Digg    reddit    Facebook    StumbleUpon


Please comment:
 
Your email address:
 
Please enter your comments including your name and location:
 
Word verification:
Please, type the code you see in the picture above.

 

Your Comments
An interesting article but I'd love you to resolve the cliff-hanger at the end:
What do you think the critical questions society should be asking itself now?

One question I think people should be asking is 'what can I create, not what can I consume?'

Antony Evans, UK
posted on : 22-Jan-2009
While I agree with your comments about the lack of questions in the speech by President Obama, I also believe that the questions not raised in his passionate speech to the world was done for reasons different from those of President Lincoln. I also suspect that one of his greatest assets is his ability not only to ask, but most importantly to LISTEN and that capacity is one that is shared by too few leaders no matter where they lead. Also I fully suspect that his capability to ask tough questions has already been accomplished by the charge he has placed to the people he has picked for the key positions in the new administration. Time will tell whether he is asking the right questions or whether he is not.

My sense of his speech was that it was designed to inspire hope and a sense of challenge for responsible actions to all people, no matter what their stage in life. The government’s job, in my opinion, is not to "take care of" all people, rather to provide the incentives that give them the opportunity to achieve independence and live their lives by exercising control over the things that they face and to exercise independent and collective action for the outcomes as opposed to seeing themselves as victims who need a government to care for them and all of the concerns they face.

Daniel Kanouse, Ph.D., USA.
posted on : 21-Jan-2009
I think you might need to differentiate rhetorical questions from transformational ones. The quoted Lincoln questions all appear to fall into the first category eliciting "yes' or "no" answers. Obama's question whether government "works" cuts to the core.

Stephen Wilson, UK
posted on : 21-Jan-2009
Your article is provocative but given the weight of expectation and the fact that the people you quote - Lincoln, Kennedy - have the gentle favour of history and hindsight blowing gently in their favour, what may appear as clever questions may cruelly be exposed as mere dithering in the harsh light of the here and now.

Ernest, Nigeria
posted on : 21-Jan-2009

Your Comments

 


Share this article Find us in  
INSEAD on Facebook INSEAD on Linkedin INSEAD on Twitter Bookmark this page INSEAD on Youtube INSEAD on iTunes  

 

Video Vault More Video

Related Articles

bulletUS economy may plunge into depression if banking sector bail-out fails

bulletWe should heed the lessons of the collapse of the ‘golden age’: a personal view

bulletLiving with uncertainty

bulletSteering a new course in unchartered waters


bulletCan China help power the global economy out of a crisis?

bulletBanks in Asia may weather global financial crisis

 


Related Programmes

bulletConsulting and Coaching for Change


Hot Topics

Blue Ocean Strategy

Economics / Politics

Entrepreneurship & Family Enterprise

Finance

Innovation

INSEAD Leadership Summit

Leadership

Marketing

Networking & Organisations

Strategy

Social Innovation

Deciphering the Crisis

Corporate Governance

Op-Eds

Gender Diversity

Subscribe now for free access!
Your Email : GO