insead      
The Team Newsroom Contact Us
Knowledge  
Search
GO
 
Home Podcast Portal iTunes U
Newsletter
RSS Login Text Guided Tour
 

Sound long-term strategy is key, particularly in a crisis: Harvard’s Michael Porter

With the current global economic downturn, there's been plenty of talk of doom and gloom. But Professor Michael Porter of Harvard University, a leading authority on competitive strategy, begs to differ. He believes this time of great economic upheaval to be the tipping point for companies – if only they know how to harness the right strategies.  

“It’s times like these when tremendous competitive success can be achieved. It’s times like these where companies can shift positions in the marketplace. It’s times like these when leaders can become followers, and followers can become leaders, because we are in a period where everything is now going to open and unfreeze.”

Redefining strategy

And it is at times like these, Porter emphasises, that strategy is most important. With strategy generally being about earning a superior return over the longer run, its essence, he explains, is then about figuring out which set of needs you are going to meet in your company, which are different from the needs that you competitors are trying to meet.

Michael Porter“The worst mistake in strategy – and it’s a particularly bad mistake in a slowed economic downturn – is to compete with your competitors on the same thing. You want to find a different kind of value that you can deliver to a different set of customers. Strategy is fundamentally about how you’re going to deliver unique value.”

And Porter believes there’s no better time than now to heed this advice to differentiate yourself from the competition – and thrive. “In a time of economic downturn, you have to be clearer about your strategy than in normal times. When things are growing, lots of companies can be successful. In difficult times, the companies that win are the ones who are very clear about who they are and how they are trying to deliver value.

“In times of economic distress, clarity of strategy becomes even more important. In an economic downturn, figuring out what part of the industry that you want to serve becomes incredibly important.”

He cautions, however, that businesses should not overreact to the unusual conditions of a downturn, and not change their entire strategy because of the particular set of customers who are not buying today. And a sound strategy, he adds, needs a few years to incubate in order for it to really bear fruit. 

 

Seeing the big picture

 

Another gaffe to avoid is what Porter calls the paradox of economic downturns. “Every bit of pressure is pulling companies to doing whatever is necessary to survive …What we’ve found over and over again is that to survive you actually have to have the capacity to integrate the short term and the long term, and think about the two together. And you can’t take actions in the short term that seem expedient, if they ultimately undermine what’s different or unique about the company. Companies that really overreact to the downturn I think get themselves into big trouble.”

To cite an example, Porter explains that if a company that is strategically focused on providing excellent products with excellent service suddenly cuts back on service and activities to cater to price-sensitive customers, they risk undermining their longer-term success and become just like their competitors who are all cutting prices as well. “When you cut and shrink, don’t do it across the board; cut to a strategy, don’t just cut. Don’t just take 10 per cent off every department – that’s a disaster.”

Making good out of the bad

 

But there appears to be a silver lining this cloud. As companies are normally scrutinised every quarter on their profitability, the pressure is always on to keep the numbers healthy. But at times like this, Porter says that the stock price and quarterly results actually don’t matter very much because nobody is going to look good. And trying to look a little better when everybody is bad doesn’t really get you much.

He adds that it is ironic that during such trying times that companies have the greatest flexibility to make unprecedented moves and investments that they would otherwise not have been able to do in more normal periods when they’re under more short-term scrutiny.

“At times like these, there’s a possibility to make moves that you could never dream of making before …We’ve got to see this for what it is. We’re going to have to understand that the rules of economics and competition are going to continue, and we’ve got to take advantage of this period to try to move our business forward.”



Last updated: December 21, 2010


KC 10/08

 



Share knowledge with:


del Del.icio.us     Digg    reddit    Facebook    StumbleUpon


Please comment:
 
Your email address:
 
Please enter your comments including your name and location:
 
Word verification:
Please, type the code you see in the picture above.

 

Your Comments
Another piece that makes Prof. Porter right on target at the right time ... Even if the traditional "pandora box opening" paradigm that makes many management science books sell well is obviously central, Porter has the kindness to remind us to stay put, as long as we keep producing excellence with a long-term vision. What behind his words Prof. Porter is telling us is that despite the acceleration - so characteristic of today's society and economics - a good product, good preparation, good planning and a good team capable to adapt quickly to circumstances without completely having to question the fundamentals of their strategy should prevail ... and even more ... take leading market positions over those that are more fragile and less stable on their long term strategy. In pure marketing, this could result in questionning or not a product's USP strategy. Prof. Porter´s book is in fact a bit of a Darwinist expose on today's economics. If his conclusions are valid to better manage the present downturn, they surely will remain valid to manage the next one. The most interesting case will be to see if companies will take different positions and strategies during the next upturn and jeopardise their long-term positions.

Pierre Blime
Managing Partner, Horizon Development
Former Harvard & INSEAD Research Associate
posted on : 05-Jan-2010
One particular point makes this a great article (for me)! To not compete on the same thing, though not easy at all.

Takes charisma, creativity, and the sharpness to decide on which "same thing" to do better & which to differentiate.

Oh, and the guts to be creative shall separate the great from the myopic.

Wilkie, S'pore
posted on : 08-Apr-2009
Professor Porter's comments are very, very interesting.

Aliane
France
Analyse site
posted on : 17-Feb-2009
Talk about stating the obvious and getting lots of money for it...

posted on : 20-Jan-2009
Professor Porter's comments are really very interesting: the leaders of companies must understand for once that short term and long term must walk together.

Companies must focus on goals that are very clear and keep permanent innovation programmes if they want to survive in the long term.

Luís Gonçalves - Angola.
posted on : 11-Jan-2009
Porter's comments are interesting and timely--if only that they reveal larger issues surrounding how companies are deciding what kinds of long term strategies are most important, and what future sources of competitive advantage actually will be.

This uncertainty, especially in the context of a global economic meltdown, is symptomatic of a larger crisis in the educational system that prepares young people to lead the world's companies. Do traditional business administration programs really endow managers with appropriate tools and skills to perform in an increasingly complex, global economic system?

The business world encountered by today’s MBA and BBA graduates is fundamentally different than that of Michael Porter's in the 1970s and 1980s. It is one with rapidly changing local, federal and international governmental policy, shifting forms of organisational structure, growing emphasis on intangible resources, and challenges of global environmental sustainability.

In fact, this last topic is especially striking. The emphasis of conventional BBA and MBA programmes on generating shareholder value through focus on competitive advantage is dangerously simplistic and shortsighted today. The past two decades have brought us radical new ways of looking at management goals and activities, including the concept of the Triple Bottom Line, Lovins’ system of natural capitalism, and McDonough’s cradle-to-cradle product design process. Management education must prepare students to effectively and intelligently navigate these elements. The future of our global economy depends on it.

Natalya Sverjensky
Parsons School of Design
New York, New York
posted on : 09-Nov-2008
This same sound advice can equally apply to individuals. Those that are better positioned to succeed in an economic downturn take charge with adaptive responses to changing environments.

As Professor Porter states, seeing the big picture is critical. The capacity to integrate short-term and long-term thinking to careers enables executives to: 1. Analyse their context to act on future trends, threats and opportunities. 2. Rework career strategies and proactively develop new capabilities with a strategic eye on emerging business models and segues to suit their needs and unique capabilities. 3. Shape a distinctive leadership brand based on signature strengths. 4. Act with resilience while managing any inherent risks. 5. Seize the opportunities that change presents.

Dianne Jacobs
The Talent Advisors
Melbourne, Australia

posted on : 09-Nov-2008
As usual, it is again wonderful to know the thoughts of Professor Porter!

With due acknowledgement to the thoughts of Professor Porter, what I wish to say is in the context of competitive advantage.

During extraordinary difficult times like the current credit crunch- which has hit the world's leading markets- companies can take a hit on their composite set of competitive advantages.
Resultingly, companies whose reconfigured set of competitive advantages can at least fetch survival, shall survive! Those whose reconfigured set of competitive advantages are not even able to fetch survival, shall collapse! In the latter context, Lehman Brothers is a perfect example.

During extraordinary times, when the industry itself undergoes a sea change, new areas of competitive advantages emerge. For example, this worldwide credit crunch has seen the banking industry getting nationalised to a very large extent, particularly in the UK, USA and the rest of Europe. Quite evidently, the market leader in such a reshaped industry shall have quite a different composition of competitive advantages. So, an organisation as a result of extraordinary times, will have to ascertain and accomplish the right set of different competitive advantages which can secure it the winning position in the industry!

Manish Parsuramka
Business Management Professional
India
posted on : 02-Nov-2008
Mr.Porter is right on the bull's eye. Every bad situation in the market gives you new learning and you should listen to the new needs of customers and you will have to augment that, and that will help you to float back well in the segment. Every downturn is a clear message that what you have been doing is no good, and no longer good is the message every downturn tells the people in subtle ways. You should have sharp ears to hear and sharp eyes to see and if you plan according to such dictates, naturally you are the winner. That is what we call the principle of the business cycle. You are every day to awaken to the new situations since you are to work with human beings- the most incorrigible animals you might have ever seen. Hence economics worked on the business cycles principle.

Every business cycle, a little candle is lit in the tunnel of darkness and that little light is the strategy and that soon brightens to help you find a new way of life. Every drive of the wheel is not going to take the same way you anticipated but it takes you to a new route and if you know how to peddle then you have done your strategy well.

Learn to live in hard times and that will help develop in you the verve to face any problem. Bush tried but he failed just because he did not have enough stamina to fight through, just because he lost track with things. He attempted in Iraq to remodel world economics but he could not just because he could not get people like Porter to be with him, to work with him!

Dr.G Balakrishnan
Professor Emeritus- Economic legislations & Law
Bombay, India
posted on : 30-Oct-2008

Your Comments

 


Share this article Find us in  
INSEAD on Facebook INSEAD on Linkedin INSEAD on Twitter Bookmark this page INSEAD on Youtube INSEAD on iTunes  

 

Video Vault More Video

Related Articles

bulletRevisiting the Five Forces framework - an update

bulletBlue Ocean Strategy

bulletFast Strategy: Staying ahead of the game


bulletUS economy may plunge into depression if banking sector bail-out fails

bulletWe should heed the lessons of the collapse of the ‘golden age’: a personal view

 


Related Programmes




Hot Topics

Blue Ocean Strategy

Economics / Politics

Entrepreneurship & Family Enterprise

Finance

Innovation

INSEAD Leadership Summit

Leadership

Marketing

Networking & Organisations

Strategy

Social Innovation

Deciphering the Crisis

Corporate Governance

Op-Eds

Gender Diversity

Subscribe now for free access!
Your Email : GO