Supported Browser
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Contact us
Economics & Finance - BLOG

Should Comcast and Time Warner Cable Be Allowed to Merge?

Miklos Sarvary, Carson Family Professor of Business at Columbia Business School |

There are fears that the tie up of the cable giants will only increase their monopoly power. While this is true, it’s not all bad news for customers.

Since the announcement of Comcast's planned acquisition of Time Warner Cable (TWC) most observers argue that the union will lead to increased monopoly power and (so goes the logical argument) even higher cable subscription fees for consumers. While I agree with much of what is being said about the market power of cable operators in the U.S., I disagree with the statement that acquiring TWC will increase Comcast's market power over consumers in particular, and thus lead to higher subscription fees.

First, the two cable operators do not have overlapping networks so they are de facto monopolies as it is. In the case of TWC, I believe that prices might even come down. TWC is a pure operator so when it buys content (generally provided by another monopolist), there is double marginalisation that leads to higher prices than what a cartel would provide (yes, there is no mistake: a cartel providing complementary products prices lower than two independent complementary providers).

Comcast owning a lot of content may prevent this. Another concern is precisely Comcast's vast content assets. Given Comcast's increased clout due to the acquisition, it can now extract more surplus from other content providers or lock them out of its offering altogether, substituting its own content in the bundle. This may happen but neither of these strategies is likely to lead to higher subscription fees for consumers. It would simply mean less profit to other content providers.

Now, are high subscription fees a problem? The answer is a resounding yes! But they are not caused by mergers between cable operators. Rather, the issue is that there is not enough competition across network types. This may change if telecom companies, DBS operators and Google develop alternative infrastructure. However, an enlightened regulator may not like this, as this may lead to excess infrastructure investment. Another approach would be to regulate part of the offering. This is already the case to some extent, but the approach needs an update. A good solution could be to regulate broadband access fees over cable. This could keep video prices in check and force cable companies to provide reasonably priced content bundles to consumers.

 

Miklos's blog

Follow INSEAD Knowledge on Twitter and Facebook

Comment
Manoj Kusshwaha,

nice article short but interesting. thanks a lot for sharing

Add a comment Already a member?
We welcome your comments and encourage lively debate. However, to ensure the quality of discussion, our moderators reserve the right not to publish personal attacks, abusive comments or overly promotional content. You can view our Terms & Conditions
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Your Privacy

INSEAD takes your privacy very seriously. For this reason, we inform you that the data collected via the form above is processed electronically for the purpose(s) specified in this form and will not be used outside this framework. In accordance with the Data Protection Act of 6 January 1978 amended by the GDPR, you are granted statutory rights of access, modification, update, deletion and limitation of treatment of your personal data. You may exercise these rights at any time by writing or sending an email to INSEAD at insead.knowledge@insead.edu. You have the right, on legitimate grounds, to object to the collection and processing of your personal information. For more information, please see our privacy policy.