Skip to main content
believers.jpg

Strategy

The Conspiracy Theory of Management: Implementing Strategy from the Top Down

The Conspiracy Theory of Management: Implementing Strategy from the Top Down

Nurturing a coterie of 'true believers' and expunging the confirmed ‘doubters’ is key to strategic success.

Developing good strategy can involve a lot of hard work but it’s of little use to anyone if execution fails. As I mentioned in a previous post, the first stumbling block that good strategies often take is when the team around you does not understand it, agree with it or is incapable of implementing it. Good people, top level performers, can enhance a strategy’s likelihood of success but all too often implementation breaks downs because of the people involved. Strong leadership and decisive use of human resources is key to solving this ‘People Puzzle’, and building a bridge for the successful execution of the most robust strategy.

To implement strategy single-mindedly, the CEO is best served by working closely with a small coterie of devout ‘believers’.   These believers (The Conspirators), a tight bond of no more than three or four trusted colleagues selected from within the immediate executive team, form what I refer to as the ‘conspiracy theory of management’.

This inner circle must adhere to a number of principles. First, they must understand and believe in the strategy as strongly as the CEO does, and behave in line with it. They must be absolutely loyal to the CEO and the company and finally, they must be willing to explain the strategy, and its implications, to any doubters within the organisation. They must be able to deputise for the CEO in terms of explaining the strategy and its consequences and required behaviours at times when the CEO is not in the room!

Fostering a sense of trust and joint endeavour within this small group is instrumental to success. These select individuals should be able to challenge and question the CEO while conspiring behind closed doors, precisely because the CEO trusts them and needs that sort of constructive challenge.  Clarity is essential for the successful implementation of strategy. If a CEO fails to set out clear objectives for his or her inner circle to pass down through the organisation, mediocre strategy implementation will be the inevitable result. True believers need to feel they fully understand the strategy and recognise that they are responsible for implementing it.

The CEO then has to look at the doubters and make a decision on whether he feels they can be “turned”. There is no room in any organisation for confirmed doubters. Their cynical attitude towards a strategy can spread and become toxic, making execution more difficult and expensive. The doubter can also be a bad role model for his or her juniors, radiating scepticism throughout the company. They may be good and effective employees, but if they’re getting in the way of strategy implementation, it is critical they be moved to less integral roles. In more extreme cases, a CEO may find it necessary to manage a few high-profile dismissals.

A successful “conspiracy” requires more than loyalty. Having the right people in place at all levels is critical. A mediocre team can run the best strategy aground or deliver sub-optimal results at best. Companies should first hire the best people possible and then proceed to educate and motivate them.

Many of the CEOs I interviewed pointed out that attracting top level performers at all ranks of management massively increases the likelihood of success. Indeed, many insisted that over-investing in people, led to both superior commitment and superior strategic performance.

Chris Outram is a founder of OC&C Strategy Consultants. He has an MBA with Distinction from INSEAD (’77) and is the author of Making Your Strategy Work: How to Go From Paper to People. Follow him on Twitter @ChrisOutram1

Follow INSEAD Knowledge on Twitter and Facebook

About the author(s)

View Comments
(5)

Anonymous User

04/08/2014, 12.17 pm

What happened to Valuing Diversity? This article is so simplistic that it verges on simple-minded, and encourages tribal mentality.

0
0

Anonymous User

26/06/2014, 09.35 pm

Would it not be better to see robust debate around the strategy happening openly within the organisation? This article seems to advocate that any dissent happens behind closed doors and that the culture is one of loyalty above all else. Groupthink and authoritarian are the words that come to mind!

0
0

Anonymous User

23/06/2014, 04.08 pm

To be honest, this article just says "things". In my opinion, it doesn't not give any knowledge. I am missing evidence supporting this nice story about strategy implementation.

0
0

Anonymous User

20/06/2014, 10.58 am

I am not sure the idea of strategy as conspiracy and belief is a helpful one. Is it not the hallmark of truly good strategy that it appears almost self evident and resonates as incisive without blind faith? If loyal top performers cannot follow the strategy, should a wise leader not engage and improve rather than assume his groupthink circle knows best and that challenges are best resolved thru dismissals, fear and coercion?

0
0

Anonymous User

19/06/2014, 09.13 pm

It's so true , the trick is to have a set of believers who can show the mirror to the boss and speak their mind with conviction on disagreements with the BOSS !

0
0
Leave a Comment
Please log in or sign up to comment.