Supported Browser
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Contact us
Career - BLOG

Three Crucial Advantages of Multicultural Management Teams

Nirmalya Kumar, Distinguished Fellow, INSEAD Emerging Markets Institute |

International experience and insight matter far more than what it says on your passport.

While many large companies are multinational, most of the top management teams (TMTs) in these companies are not. They tend to be dominated by executives with a connection to the home country of the company. Attention is paid to gender diversity, but cultural diversity is often ignored.

One must first agree that there are some benefits to having mono-cultural TMTs (all coming from the same nationality and speaking the same language). Since mono-cultural teams share assumptions, world views and language, communication between them is efficient. This speeds up decision making and reduces conflict among team members. Anyone who has participated in culturally diverse teams has encountered problems on these fronts.

Benefits of cross-cultural teams surpass drawbacks only when the organisation has multinational operations. In this context, cross-cultural teams have three crucial advantages:

1. Greater insight into markets: Intimate familiarity with a given culture and its consumption patterns yields deeper consumer insights. A culturally diverse team is more likely to have superior knowledge of the political and social idiosyncrasies of different foreign markets. A diverse TMT is also better able to monitor changes in major markets if it has representatives from those markets, since people, no matter where they live, stay connected to their home country.

2. Enhanced credibility with global stakeholders: Multinational companies must navigate the heightened expectations of their global stakeholders. They have to negotiate, mediate and communicate with important stakeholders, including government leaders, union bosses, NGOs, big local investors and media representatives. A diverse TMT enhances the cultural bandwidth to effectively interact with stakeholders from different countries. Connecting with stakeholders in a particular country is easier if there is a person from that culture on the team. With cultural diversity, the entire TMT has greater credibility when travelling across borders.

3. Improved morale among employees: Multinationals have little choice but to employ locals in every country they operate in. For the employees, a culturally diverse TMT is a powerful symbol of meritocracy. In my experience working with over 200 multinationals, I have observed TMT diversity to be powerful in motivating employees.

I recall being the keynote speaker at a global leadership conference held 15 years ago by a Norwegian multinational company. The firm had a large footprint in the Middle East, as well as in South and Southeast Asia. As a result, of the 500 or so leaders gathered, a quarter of the audience was of South Asian origin. As I descended from the podium after my address, about 100 people, all of South Asian heritage, lined up to talk to me. Usually, a few people come up after a speech, but this was an unusually long line. I shook hands one by one, feeling quite puzzled by the outpouring of enthusiasm. I finally got the answer when the 15th person greeted me and said: “Professor, I have been with this company for 15 years. For 15 years I have seen the Norwegians on the podium at this annual conference telling us Indians what to do. Now, at long last, there was an Indian telling the Norwegians what to do. Thank you.”

A note of caution

I want to end on a note of caution with respect to culturally diverse TMTs. First, as already mentioned, the benefits only apply if the enterprise is multinational. In a single-market company, these advantages would become drawbacks. Second, it is critical not to assess cultural diversity by simply counting passports. More important is the international experience of the TMT members − for instance, how long have they lived in different countries − because that is what delivers some of the advantage. Third, all companies evolve in their journey to be more multinational. It begins with sales and supply chains; culturally diverse TMTs are the last stage.

Nirmalya Kumar is a Visiting Professor of Marketing at London Business School and Distinguished Fellow at INSEAD Emerging Markets Institute.

Follow INSEAD Knowledge on Twitter and Facebook.


"In a single-market company, these advantages would become drawbacks."
What do you have in your mind that you conclude this?

Add a comment Already a member?
We welcome your comments and encourage lively debate. However, to ensure the quality of discussion, our moderators reserve the right not to publish personal attacks, abusive comments or overly promotional content. You can view our Terms & Conditions
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your Privacy

INSEAD takes your privacy very seriously. For this reason, we inform you that the data collected via the form above is processed electronically for the purpose(s) specified in this form and will not be used outside this framework. In accordance with the Data Protection Act of 6 January 1978 amended by the GDPR, you are granted statutory rights of access, modification, update, deletion and limitation of treatment of your personal data. You may exercise these rights at any time by writing or sending an email to INSEAD at [email protected]. You have the right, on legitimate grounds, to object to the collection and processing of your personal information. For more information, please see our privacy policy.